130 case study answer goal this is as an example how individual and collective interests diverge in competitive environments, leaving buyers collectively worse off. The FTC in Ethyl defined this divergence: An individual customer may rationally need to have advance notice of price raises, uniform added pricing, or most favorite nation clauses available in connection with case study answer acquire of antiknock compounds. However, individual buyers are usually unable to discover or to degree case study solution overall effect of all dealers pursuing case study answer same practices with many buyers, and don’t understand or recognize case study answer benefit of prohibiting case study solution practices to improve case study answer aggressive environment . a most favorite nation clause is perceived by particular person buyers to guarantee low prices; while widespread use of case study solution clauses has case study answer opposite effect of keeping prices high and uniform. In short, advertising and marketing practices which are preferred by both dealers and buyers may still have an anticompetitive effect. 131 case study answer appellate court, however, disagreed.